| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Asellus 
 
 
 Joined: 05 Jun 2007
 Posts: 865
 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:33 pm    Post subject: One-Step Challenge |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Here is a puzzle I came across that I discovered can be solved using only a single advanced step.  However, it's not so easy to spot. 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------+-------+-------+ | . . . | . . 5 | . . . |
 | . 7 . | 4 . 9 | . . 8 |
 | . 3 . | . 2 . | . 9 . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . 8 1 | 2 . . | 5 4 . |
 | . . . | . . . | . . . |
 | . 6 2 | . . 8 | 1 3 . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . 9 . | . 6 . | . 7 . |
 | 3 . . | 7 . 1 | . 2 . |
 | . . . | 5 . . | . . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| TKiel 
 
 
 Joined: 22 Feb 2006
 Posts: 292
 Location: Kalamazoo, MI
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:40 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Nothing more advanced than naked pairs to this point, then 'the step', then nothing more advanced than hidden singles. 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
 | 48     12     9      | 1368   1378   5      | 23467  16     12346  |
 | 12     7      6      | 4      13     9      | 23     5      8      |
 | 458    3      45     | 168    2      67     | 467    9      146    |
 |----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
 | 79     8      1      | 2      37     367    | 5      4      69     |
 | 79     45     3      | 16     1457   467    | 2689   68     269    |
 | 45     6      2      | 9      45     8      | 1      3      7      |
 |----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
 | 12     9      458    | 38     6      234    | 348    7      1345   |
 | 3      45     458    | 7      489    1      | 4689   2      4569   |
 | 6      12     7      | 5      3489   234    | 3489   18     1349   |
 *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
 
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| nataraj 
 
 
 Joined: 03 Aug 2007
 Posts: 1048
 Location: near Vienna, Austria
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:41 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| could it be you guys are referring to a rather long chain linking r2c1 and r9c2? Not sure I could call this a W-wing but it certainly does the trick by eliminating 2 from r1c2 and r7c2.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| nataraj 
 
 
 Joined: 03 Aug 2007
 Posts: 1048
 Location: near Vienna, Austria
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:08 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| as a slightly differnt approach, one could start coloring the '12' cells in box one and arrive rather swiftly at r5c8=1 => r9c8=1 => r9c2=2 and so on. 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
 | 48     1g2r   9     | 1368   1378   5      | 23467  16g    12346  |
 | 1r2g   7      6     | 4      13r    9      | 2r3    5      8      |
 | 458    3      45    | 168    2      67     | 467    9      146    |
 |---------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
 | 79r    8      1     | 2      37r    367    | 5      4      6r9    |
 | 79     45     3     | 16     1457   467    | 2689   68gr   269    |
 | 45     6      2     | 9      45     8      | 1      3      7      |
 |---------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
 | 12     9      458   | 38     6      234    | 348    7      1345   |
 | 3      45     458   | 7      489    1      | 4689   2      4569   |
 | 6      12     7     | 5      3489   234    | 3489   18     1349   |
 *-------------------------------------------------------------------*
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Asellus 
 
 
 Joined: 05 Jun 2007
 Posts: 865
 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:14 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Yes, a long XY-Chain is the one advanced step.  There are at least two of them.  (There's one that eliminates <6>s in Boxes 3 and 6.) 
 Nataraj,
 
 Your coloring is not conventional multi-digit coloring because it involves several weak links.  Rather, it is color marking the XY Chain implications.  (In other words, it is identical to XY Chaining: your coloring reveals the XY Chain with <6> pincers I mentioned above.)
 
 Also, I believe you meant to write "R5C8=8" and to mark the <6> as "rg" in R5C8.
 
 If one first applies the X-Wing on <1> in C28, then conventional Medusa (multi-digit) coloring results in a "Medusa Wrap" that reveals this same contradiction:
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+ | 48   1g2r 9     | 368  378  5     | 23467 1r6g 2346 |
 | 1r2g 7    6     | 4    1g3r 9     | 23    5    8    |
 | 458  3    45    | 1r68 2    67    | 467   9    146  |
 +-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
 | 79   8    1     | 2    37   367   | 5     4    69   |
 | 79   45   3     |#1g6r 1457 467   | 2689 #6r8g 269  |
 | 45   6    2     | 9    45   8     | 1     3    7    |
 +-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
 | 12   9    458   | 38   6    234   | 348   7    1345 |
 | 3    45   458   | 7    489  1     | 4689  2    4569 |
 | 6    12   7     | 5    3489 234   | 3489  18   349  |
 +-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
 | 
 With the extra <1>s out of R1, we are able to exploit the strong links and quickly find two "red" <6>s in R5.  Thus, all of the "red" values are removed and all of the "green" values placed.
 
 Note that this conventional method of coloring is not restricted to bivalue cells (as seen in R3C4 for instance).
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Johan 
 
 
 Joined: 25 Jun 2007
 Posts: 206
 Location: Bornem  Belgium
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:16 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I found a 9-cell xy-chain that solved the puzzle in one time 
 But like Asellus said, very hard to spot.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:24 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Quote: |  	  | Yes, a long XY-Chain is the one advanced step. | 
 
 What about the W-Wing on 16? That solved it for me.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Asellus 
 
 
 Joined: 05 Jun 2007
 Posts: 865
 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:48 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Marty wrote: |  	  | What about the W-Wing on 16? That solved it for me. | 
 Nice catch.  I didn't see it.
 
 One way or another, that <6> in R5C8 is definitely toast!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Johan 
 
 
 Joined: 25 Jun 2007
 Posts: 206
 Location: Bornem  Belgium
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:22 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| This is the 9-cell xy-chain, eliminating <3> R2C5. 
 [37][79][96][68][81][12][21][12][23]
 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +------------+---------------+----------------+
 | 48  12 9   | 1368 1378 5   | 23467 16 12346 |
 |h12  7  6   | 4    1-3  9   |i23    5  8     |
 | 458 3  45  | 168  2    67  | 467   9  146   |
 +------------+---------------+----------------+
 |b79  8  1   | 2   a37   367 | 5     4 c69    |
 | 79  45 3   | 16   1457 467 | 2689 d68 269   |
 | 45  6  2   | 9    45   8   | 1     3  7     |
 +------------+---------------+----------------+
 |g12  9  458 | 38   6    234 | 348   7  1345  |
 | 3   45 458 | 7    489  1   | 4689  2  4569  |
 | 6  f12 7   | 5    3489 234 | 3489 e18 1349  |
 +------------+---------------+----------------+
 
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| TKiel 
 
 
 Joined: 22 Feb 2006
 Posts: 292
 Location: Kalamazoo, MI
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:32 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Quote: |  	  | What about the W-Wing on 16? That solved it for me. | 
 
 This is what I referred to.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |