| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		ravel
 
 
  Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:31 pm    Post subject: Nice and unique | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		   +-------+-------+-------+
 
 | . . 1 | . . . | 2 . . |
 
 | . 3 4 | . . . | 5 1 . |
 
 | 6 5 . | . . . | . 3 7 |
 
 +-------+-------+-------+
 
 | . . . | 8 . 3 | . . . |
 
 | . . . | 9 4 5 | . . . |
 
 | . . . | 2 . 1 | . . . |
 
 +-------+-------+-------+
 
 | 1 4 . | . . . | . 7 5 |
 
 | . 6 5 | . . . | 3 4 . |
 
 | . . 9 | . . . | 8 . . |
 
 +-------+-------+-------+ TTHsieh | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:12 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Very interesting puzzle. I suspect there were more uniqueness eliminations available than I was able to come up with. But I did use a Type 4 UR, an XY-Wing and a Type 1 UR. Then I turned to my Medusa crutch and a couple of wraps finished it off. | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:00 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Two UR's and an XY-wing get me to here:
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
 
| 789   78    1     | 35    35    4679  | 2     689   4689  | 
 
| 789   3     4     | 67    29    2679  | 5     1     689   | 
 
| 6     5     2     | 14    189   489   | 49    3     7     | 
 
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
 
| 45    129   67#   | 8     67#   3     | 149   259   249   | 
 
| 28    128   67#   | 9     4     5     | 167#  268   3     | 
 
| 45    89    3     | 2     67#   1     | 4679# 5689  4689  | 
 
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
 
| 1     4     8     | 36    239   269   | 69    7     5     | 
 
| 27    6     5     | 17    189   789   | 3     4     129   | 
 
| 3     27    9     | 14567 15    467   | 8     26    126   | 
 
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+ | 	  
 
 
Guess what?  A Unique Swordfish! Marked #.
 
 
The only way to avoid the DP in C7 is that R7C7 is <6>.  Puzzle solved!
 
 
(In C7, there is no other place for a <7> than in the cells marked #.  To avoid the DP, the cells marked # cannot be <6>.  The only other place for a <6> is R7C7.)
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nataraj
 
 
  Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:30 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Basics and an xy-wing (27-78-82 pivot r1c2) get one here.
 
 
This being a ravel exercise in uniqueness, at this point I did not use one of the xy-chains available
 
 
I: pincers '67' in r2c4 and '69' in r7c7 linked via r8c4, r3c4, r3c7; => r7c4=3, and the variant
 
II:pincers '17' in r8c4 and '27' in r9c2 linked via r3c4,r3c7,r7c7,r9c8; removes 7 from r8c1,r9c4,r9c6
 
 
But instead I hope to continue my UR education.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 789     78      1        | 35      35      46789    | 2       689     4689     | 
 
| 2789    3       4        | 67      289     26789    | 5       1       689      | 
 
| 6       5       28       | 14      1289    2489     | 49      3       7        | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 45      129     267      | 8       67      3        | 14679   2569    2469     | 
 
| 238     128     23678    | 9       4       5        | 167     268     2368     | 
 
| 45      89      3678     | 2       67      1        | 4679    5689    34689    | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 1       4       38       | 36      2389    2689     | 69      7       5        | 
 
| 278     6       5        | 17      189     789      | 3       4       129      | 
 
| 237     27      9        | 134567  135     467      | 8       26      126      | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
 | 	  
 
 
The URs I see (could someone pls confirm or correct the reasoning and typecasting):
 
 
A Type 4 - {3,5} r19c45. Since  r9c45 are strongly linked in 5, 3 cannot be in either of those 2 cells, therefore r9c1=3, right?
 
 
A Type 3 - {6,7} in r46c35. One of r46c3 must be {2,3,8}, together with {2,8} and {3,8} in r37c3 we have a virtual naked triple and r5c3 becomes {6,7} (remove 2,3,8 from r5c3). Right?
 
 
Those 2 steps take me to keith's position with the USf (unique swordfish), eventually. I'd just like to make sure I got the reasoning right. | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		ravel
 
 
  Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:30 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Wow, i did not notice the type 3, because the 3 in r9c1 leads to a type 1 there. 
 
 
Another point of view, which (in this case) leads to the same elimination is, that in the 2 boxes (4 and 5) 6 or 7 must be outside the UR to destroy the deadly pattern. Only in r5c3 there is a 6 and a 7, thus it must be 6 or 7 and 238 can be eliminated.
 
The same argument here is valid for the two columns 4 and 6. | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nataraj
 
 
  Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:55 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | nataraj wrote: | 	 		  | pls confirm or correct the reasoning and typecasting | 	  
 
 	  | ravel wrote: | 	 		  | Wow, i did not notice the type 3, because ... | 	  
 
I take that as a confirmation  . And "wow" ... real flattering  ! Thanks, ravel ! 
 
 
I do have another question, though:
 
 
I think I understand your argument "Another point ... eliminated" - makes perfect sense to me. But ...
 
 	  | ravel wrote: | 	 		  | The same argument here is valid for the two columns 4 and 6. | 	  
 
 
my questions:
 
- what is the DP there? I guess 67 in r29c46 
 
- But what is the reasoning and the elimination to be made from there?
 
 
Thx for your patience! | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |